It's true! The Leafs have one of the best defense corps in the NHL.

Believe it, it's true. With Tomas Kaberle unceremoniously back in the fold, there are very few teams in the NHL that can match the Buds defensive unit one though eight. Of course, this is the problem that "Master Genius" Brian Burke did not want to face. His goal was to turn the asset of Kaberle into a top flight forward, yet now his squad has a veritable cornucopia of NHL calibre defensemen and a black hole of top calibre forwards.

In truth however, the Leafs are blessed with a fine octet of defensemen. Their top four of Dion Phaneuf, Tomas Kaberle, Francois Beauchemin and Mike Komisarek are superior to most NHL teams. When their next four are included (Schenn, Gunnarsson, Lebda and Finger) there are even fewer teams that can compare. Shall we look?

Boston. Sure they have Chara, but Seidenburg, Boychuk and Hunwick do not match up with the Leafs 2 thru 4. The Bruins 5 thru 8 may include two rookies along with Andrew Ference and Mark Stuart, advantage Leafs.
Calgary's top four of Bouwmeester, Regehr, White and Giordano are fine, but they really drop off the table with Sarich, Staios, Adam Pardy and various minor leaguers.
Few teams (Toronto included) can compete with Chicago's top four of Keith, Seabrook, Campbell and Hjalmarsson. Lucky for them they rarely use fifth thru eighth defenders as they only can muster Nick Boynton, Jordan Hendry and spare parts after the top four. Slight overall advantage to Chicago still merely on the strength of their top four.
Detroit's top four of Lidstrom, Kronwall, Rafalski and Brad Stuart is still one of the tops in the league, but after those guys, the depth of Ericsson, Salei, Derek Meech and Jakub Kindl cannot compare to Toronto's. Overall advantage, Leafs.

Los Angeles is top heavy with Drew Doughty and Jack Johnson but Rob Scuderi, Matt Greene Davis Drewiske and Peter Harrold are a definite drop off from the Leafs 3 thru 6.
Montreal sports a well-rounded defense group led by the oft-injured Markov, Gill, Gorges, Hamrlik, Spacek and up and coming Subban. The Habs 7 and 8 of O'Byrne and Alexandre Picard keep the Habs top eight defense ranked lower than Toronto's.
Nashville boasts Shea Weber and Ryan Suter and a glut of young d-men in Cody Franson, Ryan Parent, Jonathon Blum and Ryan Ellis. For now however, Toronto's eight has the advantage.
The Rangers are surprisingly strong on the back end with Marc Staal, Rozsival, Del Zotto and Girardi as well as Matt Gilroy, Steve Eminger and over-paid afterthought Wade Redden. Still not enough in my mind to surpass the Leaf group. With the addition of Sergei Gonchar and the emerging Erik Karlsson to go with Phillips, Kuba, Campoli and Carkner, Ottawa definitely has a nice defensive group. Not superior to Toronto's though.

Philadelphia possesses one of the top ranked defensive units in hockey with Pronger, Timonen, Carle and Coburn. Sean O'Donnell and Andrej Meszaros at fifth and sixth is more than adequate, but I would probably take Toronto's Lebda and Finger over Matt Walker and Oskars Bartulis. Still, the Flyers along with Chicago are two of the few teams to challenge the Leafs overall back end.

San Jose falls short of Toronto even with Dan Boyle, Vlasic and Murray. Nic Wallin, Kent Huskins, Jason Demers and Jay Leach just dont measure up to Komisarek, Schenn, Gunnarsson and Lebda.

The last team that is close to matching Toronto on defense is Vancouver. Their top four of Ehrhoff, Edler, Hamhuis and Ballard are steady if unspectacular. Throw in Bieksa, Salo when healthy), O'Brien and Rome and you have a solid eight defensemen. Washington can put forth the offensive talents of Mike Green and John Carlson along with Tom Poti, Jeff Schultz and Karl Alzner. I would take Gunnarsson, Lebda and Finger over John Erskine, Tyler Sloan and Brian Fahey though.

So, as absurd as it may sound at first, upon deeper investigation it is true...Toronto has at worst one of the top five defensive units in the NHL along with Chicago, Philadelphia, Vancouver and Washington.

Comments

Geoff_9 said…
I think Calgary's D is better. Sarich is a solid Stanley Cup winner and Staios has grit, character and leadership.

Toronto SHOULD definitely be better ... especially since almost all of their players had off-years last season.

Phaneuf will rebound from a disappointing season that saw him shipped out of Calgary.

Kaberle SHOULD be better this season (but I think I heard that tune the past two or three years).

I'm not sure Beauchemin will be the player everyone has expected ... And I think Komisarek is severely over-rated.

Finger has fallen way below expectations and his payroll is a disaster ... he could be the worst value for a NON-top-four defenseman in the NHL. Toronto would love to axe this guy's salary.

But Schenn's a Sasky kid and he'll have a monster season.
August 26, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ron Hextall and the stolen Conn Smythe Trophy

Image
Ron Hextall did not deserve the Conn Smythe Trophy in 1987....there, I said it. I recently caught game seven of the '87 finals on ESPN Classic, where the Oilers beat the Flyers 3-1. Hextall was awarded the Conn Smythe Trophy to the disdain and boos of the Northlands Coliseum. Hextall was (and remains) the fourth player to win the trophy in a losing cause. Even as a teenager following these playoffs as they happened, I thought this was an injustice. Upon further inspection, I believe he only won because he was a rookie, and was the "sexy" pick as opposed to the proper pick. When looking at his numbers, it's hard to figure why he won. Hextall finished with 15 wins, 11 losses and a GAA of 2.77. Oilers, Grant Fuhr went 14 and 5 with an average of 2.46. I realize that stats cannot tell the whole story, but even if we dig further the award doesn't seem justified. His .908 Save Pct was the same as Fuhr's and tied for third behind Ken Wregget and Kelly Hrudey. Also,
Read more

Team Canada 1972, What Might have Been

Image
Guy Lafleur, if he had played in the 72 Summit Series "No way. Can you imagine what our fans would say if we allowed Bobby Orr and Phil Esposito to play for Canada in that series and either...suffered an injury that might prevent them from playing with us for a year or more?" This was the concern of Weston Adams Jr, president of the Boston Bruins as quoted on April 20, 1972. After being speculated and discussed since February 1972 at the Olympics in Sapporo Japan, the series was set to go. Early on however, controversy stirred as to who exactly would be representing Canada. Bruins GM, Milt Schmidt agreed with his boss saying, "My only interest would be to see the Russians play the Bruins for the world championship...or whatever team wins the Stanley Cup." In the Vancouver Sun a few days later, the legendary Jim Coleman responds to the American naysayers suggesting that Team Canada should be made up strictly of players from Toronto Maple Leafs and Montreal
Read more

WHA Ottawa Civics, The Two Week Franchise

Image
Tom Earl, Daryl Maggs, Mark Lomenda, Gary MacGregor, Garry Swain "Please let the fans make up their own minds," Henry Feller told a press gathering. "Let them decide if they want pro hockey here. We have to average 7,000 or 8,000 in the remaining 19 home games for a break-even point." Feller was a director of the Founders Club who had interest in buying the WHA's Denver Spurs club. Ivan Mullinex, owner of the Spurs had brought his team to Ottawa in an attempt to drum up interest and save his investment. The date was January 2, 1976 and Mullinex was in debt to a Denver bank to the tune of $1 million dollars. This same day, the newly christened Civics lost their first game under the new moniker by a score of 2-1 at Cincinnati. Star of the team, Ralph Backstrom said after the game, "Our first official notice of the move hit us when we entered the Cincinnati rink and the names on the big scoreboard read: Stingers and Civics. Until that moment we were un
Read more